比爾門施託夫Gemeinde- und Schulbibliothek附近酒店

We had a really enjoyable 3 nights, the two best attributes are the very friendly and helpful staff, and the complimentary bar. The rooms were well fitted out and modern, had a lovely stylish bathroom, very comfortable beds, and crisp linen. The continental breakfast was excellent with a wide choice of regional produce including fresh baked rolls and cheeses. My only surprise was that there was no air con as kr was the height of the heatwave, but the hotel staff gave us an excellent fan which aided sleep. There could be a place to sit inside which is quiet and away on its own. Felt calm, relaxed and taken care of at the end of the stay and would definitely come back or try other Accor hotels.

我不得不在蘇黎世住一晚,因爲我到達的時間太晚了,不能坐火車回家。酒店地理位置優越(2.5Km離機場),坐火車、公共汽車或出租車很容易到達。房間真的很舒適乾淨。它有一個保險箱,一台電視,一台帶水的冰箱,一張舒適的牀,外加衣櫃。早餐也很好。工作人員很專業,友善,樂於助人。

酒店本身有點老,但房間都是裝修的,酒店有自己的停車位,交通方便,位置靠近公園,中心很完美,一切都很好,還會再來的

這家酒店雖然房間比較小，但是位置很不錯。出門2號有軌電車到市中心。導航經常會讓走31路，其實轉有軌電車就很方便。酒店出門右轉，走個100米就是車站，坐2號線，然後再中心轉11或者7號線就到火車站了。31路會走挺遠。酒店服務也挺好。推薦。

When we checked in we were told that the breakfast was one price, but when we checked out we were charged a different (higher) price. We were also told that the taxi would be a flat $40-something dollar charge to the airport. In the morning, once again, the price went up. When the taxi dropped us at the airport we were told there was no flat charge, so the price was higher yet again. The girl at the front desk was rude and unaccommodating. I would not stay here again.

就在蘇黎世機場附近,位置很好 晚上晚點的旅客好 但是對於年長的人來說,自助入住可能很難。

nice room and easy to go any place. the best choice for me. i love parking its safty and comfortable. Great value for money, great location,Very good staff this is not a luxury hotel but nice room.If you're looking for a reasonably priced hotel in Zurich, with a great location.

您是一個商務旅行者,以合理的價格尋求一個舒適的住宿地點嗎?那麼,藍朗民宿酒店很難打敗。我經常住在這裏,我發現每晚的價格的價值、房間的質量、設施和服務都很好。我知道當我到達這裏時,舒適的牀,乾淨的房間,簡單的禮物,以及一個美好的夜晚休息是等待我的。這不是希爾頓酒店,但這不是我所期望的輕鬆地工作,在舒適的氛圍中以負擔得起的價格安靜的夜晚休息。感謝福斯廷和您的團隊經常讓我的住宿體驗愉快。

I stayed in a pod after arriving back on a late flight, instead of driving home at midnight. The pod was nice, very comfortable. The temperature was marginally too warm for me however, and you can't change the settings. That's where the positive experience ended. My phone charging port didn't work - that's fine - I can overlook that, but it's not ideal I was woken at 4.30am by people getting up and ready for the early morning flights. They were crashing and banging around with the doors and fiddling around with their luggage. Ultimately I couldn't get back to sleep because of the continued crashing and banging and ultimately only got 3.45 hrs sleep (I know this because my fitness tracker tells me so). So it was completely pointless staying - I would have got a better night's sleep at home with my 3 year old and 10 month old in the room next door. I believe the hotel's model doesn't work for the following reasons: 1) Each pod has a door with a very noisy latch. The latch doesn't have to be noisy if people are considerate, but a lot of people aren't considerate at the best of times, let alone at 4am in the morning when getting up for an early flight. It's all well and good to have lots of signs saying ”shh!” On the walls, but most people don't see it, or at least it doesn't sink in. I stayed in a capsule hotel on Japan that has roller blinds instead of doors, which are much quieter 2) people are allowed to bring their luggage into the sleeping space. This invites people to fiddle around with their luggage, which disturbs others from their sleep. Again, in the pod hotel in Japan, people must lock their luggage in lockers in the changing rooms, and are not allowed to take anything into the sleeping space - it works much better 3) the hotel has plenty of separate rooms, with a number of pods in each. Why not allocate guests to rooms by their time of arrival and departure, so that late arrivers don't disturb early departures, and vice versa? Overall, if the above 3 things are fixed, I'd probably stay again, but otherwise, definitely not