下萊茵有Wi-Fi的酒店

「酒店位置不錯。離火車站一條路步行約十分鐘就到了。出門左拐藝術博物館，前面就是斯特拉斯堡最有特色的著名景點大壩了。一路過去，步行就能逗玩各主要景點了。房間不大，但結構合理，應有的設施功能齊全，連衞生間都是有明窗的。早餐品種齊全，基本都有。貼心的還有個煮雞蛋的，水微滾，掛着一個個小網提，自己放生雞蛋，煮想要的時間。飲品有百分百的鮮橙和蘋果汁。還有各種茶葉罐。自取茶葉裝小袋泡飲。」

「在小法蘭西里，雖然周圍都是遊客，但是絲毫沒有被吵到，很舒服的入住。 設施：酒店有4層，電梯到3樓，服務員幫忙搬行李到4樓，退房時候電話也有人來幫助。房間內裝修可以看出比較久遠，木頭有爛掉痕跡但是有感受到在努力保護。窗外風景很好。1樓有spa和做臉。每個房間有一天1小時中心洗澡蒸桑拿時間，但是男女不分開，建議要去的話帶泳衣。 衞生：洗澡和衞生間是分開的。很乾凈。 環境：內部安靜舒適，外部建築物給人的心靈上的寧靜。 服務：從前台到餐廳服務員都很熱情。 ps，早餐其實選擇不算多，但是都很好吃。蛋可以點包括咖啡茶水。」

「我住了三晚。飯店位置非常便利，就在火車站對面。即使深夜抵達也沒關係。飯店裡那部古老的電梯還在使用，一定要體驗一下！前台工作人員都非常友好，我的住宿體驗很愉快。下次來斯特拉斯堡我一定還會選擇這家旅館。 飯店入口晚上11點後關閉，所以如果您要待到很晚，請務必提前了解如何開門。」

「AVOID AT ALL COSTS as this hotel is not worth the money or trust from its guests. I stayed at Le Grand Hôtel Strasbourg from October 5–6, 2025 (Room 317). What happened that night was unacceptable for any hotel, let alone a three-star one. At around 2:00 a.m., I was abruptly awakened by loud knocking. The man outside refused to identify himself, only saying, “You called for something; I’m bringing it to you”. I hadn’t requested anything. He refused to give his name, and I couldn’t confirm who he was with no peephole. He then asked, “Are you a Chinese man in Room 317?” I am a Chinese woman travelling alone. When I said no, he replied, “Oh, maybe you exchanged rooms, or maybe someone made a joke” and left. I tried to call reception using the bedside phone, but it was broken. I then used my mobile to call the number on Google Maps; the same man answered, confirming only then that he was a hotel employee. He said a “Chinese man” had called asking for help, said he was in 317, and asked the receptionist to come because he had disabilities. Instead of verifying this request (which in the end turned to be from a guest in ibis hotel), receptionist simply checked the hotel system, read my full name aloud, assumed it was correct because it “looked Chinese”, and came knocking at 2 am. When I asked whether he confirmed the caller’s name, he said, “We don’t usually ask the names of our guests”. He also refused to tell me his own name. Only the next morning did the manager say his name was “Francis”. When I asked for his surname, she replied, “That’s the name he goes by here”. This entire event shows serious failures in safety, professionalism, and privacy: -No night security protocol; staff knock on guests’ doors at 2 a.m. without verification. -Broken in-room phone and no peephole reflect clear safety risks. -The employee failed to confirm the caller’s identity. -He accessed and disclosed my full name aloud, a privacy violation. -His assumption that a Chinese name equals a Chinese man reveals racial and gender discrimination. -He tried to distribute the responsibility to me, someone woken up BY him, instead of apologizing. GOOD NEWS: The manager’s vague answer about his identity shows the hotel's good protection of personal privacy. It's just the privacy had nothing to do with its guests. Because of this, I spent the night feeling unsafe and could not sleep until 4 a.m. I have neurasthenia, and being awakened like this caused serious distress. The next morning, the reception manager admitted that proper protocol requires checking a guest’s name before approaching their room — meaning this employee ignored standard procedure entirely. She kept repeating, “this is the first time this has ever happened to us”. This statement once again showed the amazing corporate culture of this hotel: distributing their responsibility onto innocent guest. She tried to make the incident seem as an isolated case rather than a systemic issue. But if their training were truly professionally standardised, such a mistake could never have happened. The whole thing WAS a systemic problem: poor staff training, lack of supervision, and disregard for privacy and guest safety. The hotel was unable to distinguish between internal and external calls, meaning they can’t verify where a call comes from. If the man at my door had not been an employee, I would have had no way to protect myself. Guests deserve safety, transparency, and respect — not fear, negligence, and discrimination. Until this hotel takes responsibility and implements real safety measures, there will still be danger of another guest being disturbed at 2 am, there will still be invasion of privacy by its staff, and there will still be chances of wasting your money only to get no rest over night and mental distress.」

「24小時開放的俱樂部，簡直是yyds。我們六點的火車前往柏林，出發前去俱樂部喝杯咖啡，吃點小點心，真的貼心方便。感謝okko的服務人員!」

「开在市中心的一家很新的酒店，去哪裡都很方便。整体装修很摩登，房间虽然不大，但用品的选材品质都特別好，特别是床具，是最近用得最舒服的一家，晚上睡得很好。 早餐是自助的，东西选择不算特別多但基本品类都涵盖，且口味做得很不錯。 服务很贴心友善。 性价比很高！」

「Accueil avec beaucoup de gentillesse de la part de deux jeunes messieurs.」

「酒店位於斯特拉斯堡附近的小鎮，距離市中心半小時左右車程，因為趕上感恩節聖誕市集開放，酒店價格翻倍，如果按照平時的價格我覺得酒店的環境和服務還是可以接受的。我住的房間裏有全套的廚具，可以自己做飯，家庭出遊不錯的選擇。附近有古老的古建築博物館，有時間可以逛一下。」

「非常滿意的房間！地點距離火車站沒有太遠，火車站出來直走就到，房間舒適，有空調，也有免費的水，有冰箱、熱水壺，非常方便，樓下就有好吃的餐廳，斜頓面不遠處有超市。」

「優點 地點：********（靠近法國小大教堂）步行 15 分鐘即可到達，交通便利 早餐口味 劣勢 房間比預期的小，而且沒有冰箱 結論：利大於弊，哈哈」