法國大東部大區設有Wi-Fi的酒店

「我住了三晚。飯店位置非常便利，就在火車站對面。即使深夜抵達也沒關係。飯店裡那部古老的電梯還在使用，一定要體驗一下！前台工作人員都非常友好，我的住宿體驗很愉快。下次來斯特拉斯堡我一定還會選擇這家旅館。 飯店入口晚上11點後關閉，所以如果您要待到很晚，請務必提前了解如何開門。」

「在小法蘭西里，雖然周圍都是遊客，但是絲毫沒有被吵到，很舒服的入住。 設施：酒店有4層，電梯到3樓，服務員幫忙搬行李到4樓，退房時候電話也有人來幫助。房間內裝修可以看出比較久遠，木頭有爛掉痕跡但是有感受到在努力保護。窗外風景很好。1樓有spa和做臉。每個房間有一天1小時中心洗澡蒸桑拿時間，但是男女不分開，建議要去的話帶泳衣。 衞生：洗澡和衞生間是分開的。很乾凈。 環境：內部安靜舒適，外部建築物給人的心靈上的寧靜。 服務：從前台到餐廳服務員都很熱情。 ps，早餐其實選擇不算多，但是都很好吃。蛋可以點包括咖啡茶水。」

「我在豪華大床房住了兩晚，整體體驗不錯。地理位置便利：距離市中心僅一小段電車車程，靠近會議廳。房間寬敞，床很舒服。我也很喜歡飯店的茶水和咖啡沖泡設施。酒吧和餐廳是晚上放鬆身心的好去處。 工作人員友好專業，隨時準備提供協助。飯店和房間的一些區域略顯陳舊，這可能是需要改進的地方。此外，如果您不是希爾頓榮譽客會會員，停車和客房內無線網路需要額外付費。 總的來說，這是一個可靠的選擇，特別適合商務旅行或短途城市旅行。住宿舒適，工作人員樂於助人，交通便利。」

「挺好的，服務也好，位置也不錯，衞生乾淨，不愧是聖誕之都，大堂很有氣氛！一早到了酒店我申請當天吃早餐，第二天睡個懶覺就不起來，問能不能幫忙換一下，前台和餐廳都特別熱情給我換好了！房間能看見斯特拉斯堡大教堂塔尖！」

「AVOID AT ALL COSTS as this hotel is not worth the money or trust from its guests. I stayed at Le Grand Hôtel Strasbourg from October 5–6, 2025 (Room 317). What happened that night was unacceptable for any hotel, let alone a three-star one. At around 2:00 a.m., I was abruptly awakened by loud knocking. The man outside refused to identify himself, only saying, “You called for something; I’m bringing it to you”. I hadn’t requested anything. He refused to give his name, and I couldn’t confirm who he was with no peephole. He then asked, “Are you a Chinese man in Room 317?” I am a Chinese woman travelling alone. When I said no, he replied, “Oh, maybe you exchanged rooms, or maybe someone made a joke” and left. I tried to call reception using the bedside phone, but it was broken. I then used my mobile to call the number on Google Maps; the same man answered, confirming only then that he was a hotel employee. He said a “Chinese man” had called asking for help, said he was in 317, and asked the receptionist to come because he had disabilities. Instead of verifying this request (which in the end turned to be from a guest in ibis hotel), receptionist simply checked the hotel system, read my full name aloud, assumed it was correct because it “looked Chinese”, and came knocking at 2 am. When I asked whether he confirmed the caller’s name, he said, “We don’t usually ask the names of our guests”. He also refused to tell me his own name. Only the next morning did the manager say his name was “Francis”. When I asked for his surname, she replied, “That’s the name he goes by here”. This entire event shows serious failures in safety, professionalism, and privacy: -No night security protocol; staff knock on guests’ doors at 2 a.m. without verification. -Broken in-room phone and no peephole reflect clear safety risks. -The employee failed to confirm the caller’s identity. -He accessed and disclosed my full name aloud, a privacy violation. -His assumption that a Chinese name equals a Chinese man reveals racial and gender discrimination. -He tried to distribute the responsibility to me, someone woken up BY him, instead of apologizing. GOOD NEWS: The manager’s vague answer about his identity shows the hotel's good protection of personal privacy. It's just the privacy had nothing to do with its guests. Because of this, I spent the night feeling unsafe and could not sleep until 4 a.m. I have neurasthenia, and being awakened like this caused serious distress. The next morning, the reception manager admitted that proper protocol requires checking a guest’s name before approaching their room — meaning this employee ignored standard procedure entirely. She kept repeating, “this is the first time this has ever happened to us”. This statement once again showed the amazing corporate culture of this hotel: distributing their responsibility onto innocent guest. She tried to make the incident seem as an isolated case rather than a systemic issue. But if their training were truly professionally standardised, such a mistake could never have happened. The whole thing WAS a systemic problem: poor staff training, lack of supervision, and disregard for privacy and guest safety. The hotel was unable to distinguish between internal and external calls, meaning they can’t verify where a call comes from. If the man at my door had not been an employee, I would have had no way to protect myself. Guests deserve safety, transparency, and respect — not fear, negligence, and discrimination. Until this hotel takes responsibility and implements real safety measures, there will still be danger of another guest being disturbed at 2 am, there will still be invasion of privacy by its staff, and there will still be chances of wasting your money only to get no rest over night and mental distress.」

「开在市中心的一家很新的酒店，去哪裡都很方便。整体装修很摩登，房间虽然不大，但用品的选材品质都特別好，特别是床具，是最近用得最舒服的一家，晚上睡得很好。 早餐是自助的，东西选择不算特別多但基本品类都涵盖，且口味做得很不錯。 服务很贴心友善。 性价比很高！」

「•鐵路:科爾馬爾車站(Gare de Colmar)連接斯特拉斯堡(30分鐘),巴塞爾(45分鐘),蘇黎世(2小時)和巴黎(TGV約2.5時間)。 •城市交通:老城區可以步行。還提供免費的電動小巴和觀光小火車 • Eguisheim 和 Riquewihr:阿爾薩斯葡萄酒路線沿線的圖畫書般的村莊。從科爾馬爾乘汽車或巴士15～ 20分鐘。」

「就算是有點老的好酒店,安置在Obernai。免費的 Spa是另外一個。房間平靜」

「這家旅館很特別──床位分佈在兩層樓的同一間房間裡，營造出安靜的環境。地理位置也十分理想，距離斯特拉斯堡的景點和巴士站都只有幾步之遙。衛浴寬敞乾淨，男女分開。旅舍裡還有個酒吧，可以在那裡等候辦理入住或退房。工作人員非常熱情周到——我退房當天早上熱水供應不足，沒辦法洗澡。下午問題解決後，他們給了我一張熱水卡，我很快就能洗澡了。我強烈推薦這家旅舍。」

「酒店很漂亮 很 - , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 早餐不錯 但肯定不太好 我本來就希望這件事會更好 沒有蛋 一類奶 不好吃 子」