紐約Avenue Church NYC附近平價酒店預訂

西區YMCA絕對是沒有皺褶的地方,但位置優越。您就在中央公園和哥倫布環線旁邊。時代廣場向南走過去很容易。我們住了2個不同的房間。第一個有雙層牀,挺小的,但是牀很舒服,房間也乾淨。還有小電視和冰箱。我們有一個半私人浴室,就在大廳下面。這意味着我們必須掃描浴室門上的鑰匙才能進去,但一旦進去,我們打掃乾淨時就有了隱私。浴室保持乾淨整潔。我們能夠將入住的後半段升級爲房間,其中有一張大牀和一間室內浴室。再次,這家酒店沒有褶皺。週邊可以很粗糙,但結束一天的觀光,乾淨舒適。我們沒有時間利用健身房、游泳池、桑拿等,但看起來不錯。我推薦西區YMCA。如果你去紐約,你應該出去做點事情,而不是坐在房間裏。我們所需要的一切。

離中央公園還是距離20分鐘步行距離的，好在上東區安靜，比熙熙攘攘的time square好太多了，深夜回來也沒流浪漢睡大街，出門坐地鐵打uber也方便。酒店本身挺舊了，房間緊湊，衛生間略擁擠，最痛苦的是老房子開空調聲音很大，晚上烘熱了房間得關掉才能睡。總體值得推薦，佛系選擇

我從來沒有,從來沒有住過一個記得我名字的地方。貝拉是我認識的最溫暖的人之一。她是這家酒店的臉。我也受到多個團隊成員的歡迎,詢問我的住宿情況。每個人都真的很關心,等待我的回答,準備修復任何東西,或者只是輕輕地聊天,讓我的兒子搬到紐約。該地區似乎很粗略,但每個人都保持自己。靠近地鐵,與其他區域相比相當安靜。房間很乾淨,清新,牀可以用更暖和的毯子,我們發現車有街邊停車場,你真的不需要這裏車!

房間和應用程序上的照片一樣。不算太窄,寬敞,帶露台,令人愉快。地鐵站需要步行10分鐘。但是,我支付了含早餐的錢,但是當我辦理入住時,早餐只能提供咖啡和茶嗎?早餐每人14美元,每人3晚,不足84美元。預訂時只需填寫咖啡。酒店沒有迴應,幸運的是,Trip.com已經賠償了Tripcoin。

房間超級乾淨，但不幸的是聲音非常大。窗戶不隔熱且漏水，房間門也是如此。從其他房間經過的人或淋浴/電視的聲音就像在房間裡一樣大聲。由於噪音，我們連續7個晚上都無法入睡。 工作人員似乎不感興趣。廁所不能用，經過多次要求才12小時內修好。 儘管如此，這家酒店非常乾淨和現代。乍一看，這個位置/區域似乎很危險，但我們從未感到不安全。由於價格和噪音，我們不會再次預訂。步行約9分鐘即可到達地鐵站。 F 線可帶您快速輕鬆地前往市中心，無需換乘火車。

和一家5口旅行。喜歡我們的住宿。工作人員非常熱情和友善。我們需要住宿,他們滿足我們的需求,沒有問題。代客停車很有禮貌。我們的房間乾淨整潔,結構很好。我們喜歡鏡子後面的浴室。非常好。孩子們喜歡它,享受住宿。他們有一個小健身房,美麗的早餐大堂,帶桌子的低露台,以及景色優美的上露台。他們的早餐還可以。需要多做一點工作。提供吐司,百吉餅,陶瓷,燕麥片,華夫餅,雞蛋,塔特託,水果,咖啡,果汁和水。雞蛋是水的,塔特託是冷的,沒有做好。用奶油奶酪烤的麪包很棒。我們把它評爲5分之4,因爲它確實需要在他們的早餐上工作,但我們喜歡我們的住宿,並將再次訪問。謝謝!

在這裏度過了一次精彩的體驗。對於如此實惠的住宿,質量是卓越的,房間可愛,乾淨,舒適,所提供的服務很棒 - 廚房,休息室,電腦/圖書館區和洗衣房。他們也有像電影之夜這樣的活動,這是一筆很大的獎金。工作人員非常友善--特別是亞里--當我們錯過公共汽車時,他幫助了我和我的朋友。我們真的感到被照顧了。位置也很棒,幾分鐘路程就可到達地鐵站,晚上步行回家感覺很安全。我不敢相信我們找到了這個地方,而且它看起來還不錯,特別是對紐約!我強烈建議您住在這裏。非常感謝使我們的住宿如此愉快的工作人員❤

時代廣場附近性價比很高的酒店了，整體來説中規中矩，最大優勢是可以逛時代廣場，走過去並不遠，酒店工作人員特地帶到樓下並指了一下時代廣場的方向

酒店挺好，很舒服😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀

This is my third review of The Carlyle over the years (across probably 25 stays), and, sadly, the first one where I didn't feel I could give the hotel five stars. Although this is specifically about a stay in November 2022, it relates more generally to the renovated rooms at The Carlyle -- and here, the 11/22 stay was our third in a renovated room. Two were in Superior Suites, and one was in a Rosewood Suite. First, the good: The service continues to terrific, and greetings from the staff are genuine and caring. Across the board, when I raised an issue, someone tried to make things better. Housekeeping did not miss a beat. The bedding and linens are top notch. I found the beds in all three rooms terrific. And, the renovations fixed what had been a tendency for the HVAC to be spotty, depending on the room. The renovated systems worked flawlessly. And, the rooms are quiet -- no street noise or noise from adjoining rooms. In the Superior Suites, the bathrooms are small. In one of the two we stayed in, we had a half bath, which made things a bit better. But, if you want a big bathroom, then look elsewhere. I find the baths adequate, and the showers delightful (as they have been across 30 years). Now, the not so good: The lighting the renovated rooms is atrocious. In the living rooms of all three suites, there wasn't enough light to read in the evening, other than in the one chair that they equipped with a reading light. The desk lamp -- while stylish -- gives off about the equivalent of a 40 watt light bulb. Who does that? There are wall mounted sconces -- with the equivalent of 15 watt bulbs in them. One room had a ceiling unit that had 3 bulbs with the equivalent of 40 watt bulbs. Why? The traditional Carlyle had great lighting -- three way bulbs with up to 150 watts in total in each of 3 or 4 lamps in the room. In this version, I feel depressed in the rooms in the evening. And then there's the bedroom. While there are lamps on the end tables next to the bed, they are on one switch. Either both are on, or neither. Why? Why not have them separately switched? There's a spot-like reading light on each side of the bed -- but that's a poor substitute from the warmth of the bedside table light. Why would anyone design a hotel room this way? I suppose if all one does in a hotel room is look at one's phone or computer, or watch TV, the lighting will suffice. But if you want to read? Forget it. And then you get to storage. In each of the three suites there was no storage at all for your things (I've seen reviews that show some rooms having dressers). Each of the living room and bedroom had shelving, but the room designers filled the shelves with design stuff that serves no purpose, leaving those unavailable to the guest. Even the closets lack usable shelving, other than a high shelf above the hanging clothes. The old Carlyle rooms had vast amounts of storage space in large dressers. It's almost as if the room design